EB-2 NIW Academy Back to main site

Citation and Attribution

How to Cite
This Framework

EB-2 NIW Academy — Version 1.0, 2026

This page provides recommended citation formats for the EB-2 NIW Technical Framework, its relationship to prior analytical work published via SSRN, and the primary legal authorities that ground the content. A Zenodo DOI will be assigned upon formal release — this page will be updated with the permanent identifier.

Citing This Repository

The framework is authored by Wederson Marinho and maintained by ImigraScore. The recommended title for citation purposes is:

EB-2 NIW: A Technical Framework for Eligibility, Evaluation, and Petition Strategy

APA 7th Edition

APA
Marinho, W. (2026). EB-2 NIW: A technical framework for eligibility, evaluation, and petition strategy (Version 1.0) [Technical framework]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19709462

Chicago Style (Author-Date)

Chicago
Marinho, Wederson. 2026. EB-2 NIW: A Technical Framework for Eligibility, Evaluation, and Petition Strategy. Version 1.0. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19709462

BibTeX

BibTeX
@software{marinho2026eb2niw,
  author    = {Marinho, Wederson},
  title     = {EB-2 NIW: A Technical Framework for Eligibility,
               Evaluation, and Petition Strategy},
  year      = {2026},
  version   = {1.0},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.19709462},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19709462}
}

Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19709462

Relationship to Prior Work

This framework and the Marinho (2025) SSRN paper are designed as complementary analytical layers. They serve distinct but related purposes:

SSRN Paper (2025)
Conceptual and analytical foundation

Comprehensive overview of the NIW process, case studies, cost-benefit analysis, processing timelines, approval rate data, and country-specific considerations. Designed for general audiences evaluating the NIW pathway.

This Framework (2026)
Applied operational model

Translates the analytical foundation into a structured decision framework: eligibility thresholds, the three-prong test, evidentiary standards, proposed endeavor construction, and RFE risk patterns. Decision-oriented.

This framework operationalizes concepts developed in Marinho (2025), extending prior analytical work into a structured, decision-oriented model for evaluating petition strength, evidentiary positioning, and risk exposure.

Citing the Related SSRN Paper

Suggested Citation (as provided by the author)
Marinho, Wederson. The Complete Guide to EB-2 National Interest Waiver:
Comprehensive Analysis of Matter of Dhanasar for International
Professionals (November 07, 2025). Is translation of
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17508475, Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5762365 or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5762365

A Portuguese-language version of the SSRN paper is available via Zenodo at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17508475. The English SSRN version is the primary reference for this framework.

Primary Legal Citations

Controlling Precedent
Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016)
Decided December 27, 2016. Interim Decision #3882.
Available: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/err/D5%20-%20Decisions%20Issued%20in%20Appeals%20of%20Immigrant%20Petitions/2016/DEC012016_01D5101.pdf
USCIS Policy Manual
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Policy Manual,
Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 5 (Employment-Based Second
Preference, National Interest Waivers). Updated January 15,
2025 (Policy Alert PA-2025-03).
Available: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-f-chapter-5
Statute and Regulation
Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 203(b)(2)(B)(i).
8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(B)(i).

8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k) (2024).

Authorship and Attribution

Intellectual Attribution

Primary Author: Wederson Marinho
Institutional Context: ImigraScore (repository maintainer)
Intellectual Responsibility: Individual authorship (Wederson Marinho)

ImigraScore maintains this repository as an open educational and technical resource. ImigraScore operates independently as a service provider in immigration case analysis, proposed endeavor structuring, and evidentiary strategy. This distinction ensures separation between academic and educational output (this framework) and applied advisory services (ImigraScore).

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may share, copy, adapt, and build upon this material for any purpose, provided you give appropriate credit to Wederson Marinho and indicate if changes were made.

Full license text: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International